The following petitions were started after listening to thousands of voices over the six years of those experts by experience, which led to me raising these petitions over the last 2-3 years. With the numbers of signatures on each petition being over the watershed mark of 100k before it has a constitutional right to be debated in parliament. Unfortunately the governmental parliamentary sessions have been over shadowed by Brexit and now Covid-19, which has now stopped these petitions being walked down to No 10 and presented to Boris Johnson and previously Theresa May.
I have full intentions of presenting these into No 10 personally and I will remain committed to drawing the MP’s attention to these petitions on my media platforms and I wont stop doing so until they are handed in.
The petition around family court has already been handed in to Theresa May including the thousands of harrowing factual events that have been included on this particular petition. I have been told that these now sit at the heart of the inquiry and are being looked at by academics. I also aim to give this petition to our current PM Boris Johnson in due course, so he too can be furnished with these horrendous facts and the enormity of the signature counts.
If you have already signed these petitions thank you and can you keep sharing them.
Maxine Davison, Sophie Martyn, Lee Martyn, Stephen Washington and Kate Shepherd were all killed in the mass shooting which took place in Keyham, Plymouth this week. This tragedy has shocked the Nation. The gunman had his shotgun certificate removed from him in December 2020 following an allegation of assault. However, it was returned to him in July the month before he went on a shooting spree.
I am a survivor of domestic abuse and violence and suffered horrific injuries after I was shot by my estranged husband at the hair salon where I worked. The gun which was used in my attack was stolen from a house burglary and passed on. This then asks the question should firearms be kept at home? His brutal act destroyed so many lives and I vowed after that day that I would do everything in my power to make sure that doesn't happen to another person. Along with Nazir Afzal, the former Chief Prosecutor, we are calling on the UK Government to review the licencing conditions to hold any firearm.
- We are asking that no person should be granted a licence if they have previous domestic abuse/violence convictions or a history of domestic abuse.
- And that anyone who has any mental health related illnesses, to include anxiety and depression or drug/alcohol use also be refused a licence.
- For those who are granted a licence we ask that the holder has to apply biennial to renew their licence, with exception of professional shooters, sports people (Olympics, Commonwealth Games etc) the exception will also include farmers. These checks must be carried out with due diligence including social media.
- That those licence holders are not permitted to keep a firearm in the home but they have to be kept at their local gun club, with the legitimate exceptions such as farmers.
- GP records be tagged so police will be alerted to any licence holder who is or becomes unfit to hold a licence.
You may have wondered how these men were able to get hold of guns, many assume this kind of violence could not happen in the UK. But despite handguns being banned under the 1997 Firearm Amendment, research carried out following the implementation of the Act saw a 40% increase in the number of gun crime incidents in the UK (Politics.co.uk)
Guns are a problem in the UK and we need to do something about it.
*In 1987, Michael Ryan killed 16 people and wounded a further 15 with a semi-automatic rifle in a massacre in the Berkshire town of Hungerford.
*In 1996 a disturbed former boy-scout leader named Thomas Hamilton shot dead 16 young children and their teacher at Dunblane Primary School in Scotland.
*In 2010 Derrick Bird killed 12 people in Cumbria.
Please join us in calling an end to these preventable deaths so we don't lose another victim to gun violence in the UK.
Rachel Williams and Nazir Afzal
During these difficult days, weeks and months ahead, we have to be more forward thinking than ever when it comes to helping the most vulnerable in society, those whose homes are not safe havens, not today…not ever!
It has already been reported that other countries which are on lockdown have seen an increase in domestic abuse by 30%, 40% and 50%! This increase WILL hit the UK.
In the UK there are only 4,000 refuge spaces, with 19,000 referrals last year, can you just imagine based on the above figures, the increase need for refuge spaces during and after lockdown?
I am calling on the Government to arrange for Air BnB’s, Hotels and BnB’s to be used to take the overspill from the refuges. Local Authorities to open up ‘empty properties’ where appropriate to be used to help accommodate those fleeing.
Our Government to put in place special measures to allow police to have the power to evict perpetrators from homes for the duration of the lockdown.
Police to have extra resources to deal with domestic abuse call outs.
Restraining Orders/Non-Molestation Orders to be free for ALL those seeking them, and for them to be heard in court (these hearing are currently taking place virtually and via phone) as a matter of priority.
We need to make sure that all domestic abuse services have adequate PPE as they are frontline, still providing accommodation services which means they are going into refuges and are still doing face to face contact for community services where needed.
DA services to have adequate supplies of mobile phones and alarms readily available to issue to those who may seek safety in Hotels etc. so that they can have access to 24-hour support.
All funding to go straight to DA services and not via Local Authorities. Funding must be there for services during and after lockdown, as the anticipated increase in cases will have damaging effects financially to services.
Services need further funding to meet these demands.
We are all survivors of domestic violence, it affects our lives and the lives of our children. Individually our stories are unique but we are united in our determination to make a change.
Since speaking out about our abuse many people have shared their experiences with us. One story we hear time and time again is of ex-partners breaching their licenses or restraining orders. But when the breach is reported to the police often nothing happens. The perpetrator does not face consequences and is not arrested.
That's why we've started this petition calling on Theresa May to review licenses given to perpetrators of domestic violence, and make sure victims are protected.
When you report domestic violence to the police and a partner is convicted, you should be confident that you will be protected from them. The power of arrest should mean the power of arrest and as a matter of priority. If a perpetrator breaks their license and contacts their victim, they should know without a shadow of a doubt they will be arrested. Or if they breach any of the restrictions listed added to an order / license they should be held accountable as stated and signed by the judge, again as a matter of priority.
People who have experienced domestic abuse should not have to live in fear for the rest of their lives.
When Theresa May was Home Secretary she often spoke up for the rights of victims of domestic abuse. Now she is Prime Minister we hope she will stand up for us once again and use her authority to carry out the reviews necessary to make sure the system works for victims of domestic violence and that the laws set are upheld.
Please join us & sign our petition! We believe with a united voice we will be heard. We will keep shouting until we see change. Let's put an end to domestic abuse, we owe it to the next generation, our children and our grandchildren.
By Rachel Williams, Mandy Thomas & Becky O'Brien
Last night Manchester Crown Court’s Judge Richard Mansell ruled that he would not jail Mustafa Bashir, a man who made his wife drink bleach and, at one point, struck her over her back with a cricket bat saying: "If I hit you with this bat with my full power then you would be dead." Judge Mansell concluded she was not vulnerable enough because she was "an intelligent woman with a network of friends" and a university degree.
The Judge handed out a suspended sentence of 18 months - a punishment which is not enforced unless a further crime is committed during a specified period. What message does this send out to perpetrators of domestic abuse?
Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecution at the Crown Prosecution Service needs to take domestic violence seriously. Like Bashir’s partner, I went through hell with my ex, enduring domestic abuse for 18 years. At one point I was shot with a sawn-off shotgun and then beaten. My 16 year old son took his life as a result of this. I also had a network of good friends - does that mean I was not vulnerable enough too? What ignorance by the system.
For years I have been saying that judges who deal with these cases don’t fully understand the issue of domestic violence, including the power dynamics of the perpetrator and victim and how it can make you a prisoner in your home - regardless of your network of friends and how intelligent you are.
I am actively campaigning in the domestic abuse arena to see that all services listen to the voice of those who have and still are victims/survivors. Sadly we are experts by experience. All Judges should have mandatory domestic abuse training because their lack of knowledge is putting lives at risk, those lives of the vulnerable people.
I am calling on the Alison Saunders to agree to meet me, and show that the CPS understands that work needs to be done so that Judge Mansell’s actions are never repeated.
Last year, by order of the High Court advised by the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), my friend’s two high school children were taken by force in the middle of the night from the home of their mother. They were dragged out of her house screaming, put into a police van and taken to live at their father’s house. They were told their reasons for not wanting to see their father weren’t good enough and that they must have a relationship with him.
If this sounds shocking - the truth is that this is happening in the family courts all the time. Just a glance through the comments of this petition will give you an idea.
Ever since the children’s Mum left their father, he continued to find ways to exert power and control over her. The kids didn’t want to see their Dad, but with the help of a specialist barrister, that only he could afford, the children ended up being taken in the middle of the night.
Children are as much victims of the domestic abuse they see and hear.
Many months on, the children write to Cafcass asking for help, describing how miserable they are, begging to be returned to the care of their Mother and demanding their ‘human rights’. They are still not being listened to.
The Cafcass website says: "We put children’s needs, wishes and feelings first, making sure that children’s voices are heard at the heart of the family court setting, and that decisions are made in their best interests"
But CAFCASS is doing the opposite.
These youngsters asked for help. So we did research, asked questions and have received numerous letters describing more Cafcass horror stories where children are not listened to and put at risk by unsafe child contact orders.
We also found that the rights of (mainly) women, who are trying to escape abusive relationships, are still not being heard and prioritised. This is despite Family Court rules issued in 2016 which say they must be.
Family Court secrecy means that mistakes can go undetected. Concerned parents are often seen as being ‘difficult’ and ‘obstructive’. Then they are forbidden from, and afraid of speaking out!
We must stop this happening. The decision makers in the Family Court must be properly trained to spot patterns of domestic abuse and the culture of secrecy must change to being more open.
We demand that the Government ensures that in the family courts:
Mandatory Training & Education already recommended by Family Court Rules and that this is independently monitored.
These rules state: ‘All members of the Family Court judiciary and Cafcass professionals must undergo mandatory specialist training in the dynamics of domestic abuse, coercive and controlling behaviour, the frequency and nature of post separation abuse, the impact of domestic abuse on children, on parenting and on the mother-child relationship.’
The Rights of Children must always be upheld - no child should ever be subjected to this type of forced removal against their will and then left in distress and without a voice. The voices, wishes and feelings and the human rights of children should be paramount in the decision making of the courts regarding contact arrangements.
I want to thank all those who took the time and signed my non-fatal strangulation petition which received over 100k signatures. I also want to thank the women who took part in mine and Professor Jane Monckton Smith’s survey, sharing your experiences was not easy. Your voices were heard, and went towards making non-fatal strangulation a specific crime.
It will now have a place in the Domestic Abuse Bill and carry a maximum sentence of up to 5 years for anyone convicted of this violent crime. WE DID IT!!
Strangulation is a very symbolic act of control which leaves its victim in no doubt that there is a real and visceral threat to their life. If you put your hands on someone’s throat and squeeze the message and terror for the victim is clear. As a survivor of domestic violence - I know the impact it has.
That’s why I’m calling for it to be made a specific criminal offence, as part of the current review of domestic violence legislation. This will give the power to police and the justice system to treat these offences with the seriousness it deserves
Some violence is more dangerous and frightening than others, not just in that it is more likely to cause death or serious injury, but in what it predicts. Strangulation is a very particular form of assault for three reasons:
1. It is likely to cause serious injury or death
2. It is perceived by the victim as a direct threat to their life
3. It is a highly predictive of future homicide
Not everyone uses a strangulation or simulated strangulation assault in an altercation – it is controlling people who do this, and the message to them must be clear. Too often strangulation assaults in the UK are either not charged, or are explained away as ‘sex games’
Research shows that it is not taken seriously, even where the victims have lost consciousness.  This needs to change before more lives are lost. New Zealand’s government is making non-fatal strangulation a new offence that carries a maximum penalty of seven years in prison.  We must do this too.
Please help by signing thank you
 Monckton Smith